www.maziucheohia.com

(The Rediscovery of an Old Igbo Crime-Control System)

By Mazi Uche Ohia

Before another thief is compelled to perform the latest viral dance challenge with a stolen item balanced on his head, let us pause and ask a simple question:

Who taught us that punishment must always be boring?

Over the past few weeks, social media has been flooded with videos from markets across Nigeria. The storyline is simple: a suspected thief is caught. The stolen goods are recovered. Then, instead of immediately being beaten or thrown into a police van, he is issued with a simple instruction: “Dance!”

And dance he must. Sometimes with a stolen goat. Sometimes with a bag of rice. Sometimes with a television set, air conditioners, motor parts or solar gadgets. Sometimes with six cartons of noodles or whatever else he was caught stealing.

The crowd claps. The women laugh. The children whistle. Market traders abandon their stalls. Everyone with an Android phone becomes an emergency cameraman. Aspiring content creators have a field day. Unskilled commentators suddenly discover their life’s purpose.

Within minutes, the unfortunate thief—sorry, dancer—has become an international celebrity on Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and WhatsApp.

Young people think this is a brand-new invention. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Our ancestors patented this programme long before the invention of electricity. Long before mobile phones. Long before social media influencers discovered ring lights. What we are witnessing is simply an ancient Igbo social-control mechanism being streamed globally.

In pre-colonial Igboland, theft was not merely regarded as a crime against property. It was an assault on trust. And trust, not locks, was the real currency of village life.

When a thief was caught, the objective was not merely to punish him. It was to restore moral order. The community wanted everybody to learn something: the thief. His family. His friends. His neighbours. Future thieves. Even innocent children watching from behind their mothers’ wrappers.

How was this done? Simple. The thief was made to carry the very object he had stolen or, in some cases, he was made to wear it like a necklace. Then he was paraded through the village. In many communities, he was decorated with strings of empty snail shells—an unmistakable symbol of disgrace. Some places added charcoal. Others added palm fronds.

Then came the journey. Not in a police pickup where he would be shielded from prying eyes. No. On foot! Around the market. Around the village square. Past every compound. Past every elder. Past women pounding fufu or processing palm fruits. Past children climbing mango trees.

And because Igbo people have never lacked creativity, songs accompanied the procession. Not praise songs. Correction songs. Derisive songs.

By sunset, everybody knew two things. First, who the thief was. Second, what he had stolen. There was no need for breaking news. The whole village had watched the live broadcast. Shame was once one of society’s greatest teachers in Igboland.

Today, we fear shame less than low battery. Back then, a young man would rather go hungry than face such public humiliation. Not because the punishment was physically unbearable. But because it attacked something more precious than the body: reputation.

Our ancestors understood a profound truth. Some punishments touch the skin. Others touch the conscience. And the latter often lasts much longer than the former.

Contrast that with what colonialism later brought. Everything became legal. Everything became procedural. Everything required files. Charges. Adjournments. Mention dates. Applications. Counter-applications.

The thief entered court. The complainant entered court. The witnesses entered court. The lawyers entered court. Sometimes the stolen goat died before judgment or vanished from the exhibit room. Sometimes the complainant died before judgment. Occasionally, even the judge retired before judgment. Most times, judgment was delayed—and justice delayed is justice denied. Everybody suffered. Except, perhaps, the thief.

Now, let me be properly understood before my learned friends begin to look at me with suspicion. I am not suggesting that we abandon the rule of law. Certainly not. Modern justice has indispensable safeguards—especially the presumption of innocence and the need for fair trials.

No innocent person should be publicly disgraced because of mere suspicion. That principle is vital. But there is another lesson hidden inside the old Igbo method that deserves our attention. Our ancestors recognised that crime was not merely a legal issue. It was a community issue.

Society itself participated in correcting behaviour. Everybody became a stakeholder. Today, many people commit offences anonymously. Tomorrow they relocate. Next week they change their telephone number. Next month they become motivational speakers. The community remembers nothing. The conscience learns nothing. The cycle continues.

The old Igbo system understood something psychologists now tell us repeatedly: human beings care deeply about social acceptance. The fear of losing honour can sometimes restrain behaviour more effectively than the fear of imprisonment.

That is why the greatest disgrace in traditional Igbo society was not the beating. It was the parade. It was not the snail shells. It was the neighbours watching. It was not carrying the stolen yam. It was carrying it before people who knew your grandfather, before your peers, and before your sneering compatriots.

Imagine one of those village elders of old seeing today’s viral videos. He would probably adjust his red cap, smile quietly and say: “So… you people finally remembered.”

Of course, some modern versions have become excessive. Mob justice. Physical abuse. Humiliation before facts are established. Those have no place in a just society.

Wisdom must always walk hand in hand with fairness. But the underlying philosophy remains worthy of reflection. The message is simple: communities should not become indifferent to wrongdoing. Children should not grow up believing that stealing merely carries legal consequences.

It also carries moral consequences. Character matters. Reputation matters. Trust matters.

One of the greatest strengths of traditional Igbo society was that law did not live only inside the court. It lived inside the conscience. Inside the family. Inside the village. Inside public opinion.

People behaved not only because they feared punishment. They behaved because they feared bringing disgrace upon themselves, their parents and their lineage. That invisible discipline built remarkably orderly communities.

Today, we spend billions on security while spending very little on rebuilding the moral foundations that once reduced the need for security. Perhaps that is why crime appears increasingly shameless. A society that no longer values honour eventually struggles to discourage dishonour.

Maybe it is time to revisit—not blindly revive, but thoughtfully study—the wisdom of our forefathers. Not every indigenous institution deserves resurrection. But neither should every ancestral idea be dismissed simply because it existed before colonialism.

Some of our traditional methods of conflict resolution, restorative justice, communal responsibility and social correction deserve fresh attention. They were not primitive. Many were practical and functional.

Some were remarkably sophisticated. And quite a few worked. After all, there must be a reason why a thief carrying stolen goods around the marketplace with snail shells round his neck became such a powerful deterrent that generations still remember it.

The Palmwine Philosopher has spoken. This is not funny—but if you must laugh, laugh responsibly.

(Mazi Uche Ohia, Ph.D., lawyer, farmer, cultural advocate, public intellectual and former Commissioner for Tourism, Culture & Creative Arts, Imo State, writes from Arondizuogu.)